City of oberlin v ferc
WebJul 22, 2024 · On July 8, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (“D.C. Circuit”) issued its decision in City of Oberlin, Ohio v.FERC, a proceeding involving the issue ... WebNos. 18-1248 and 18-1261 (D.C. Cir. September 6, 2024) FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Mobile Menu Button
City of oberlin v ferc
Did you know?
WebCoverage of federal case City of Oberlin, Ohio v. FERC, case number 18-1248, from Appellate - DC Circuit Court. WebJul 18, 2024 · The City of Oberlin “petitioned for review claiming, among other things, that FERC did not adequately justify its reliance on agreements to transport gas ultimately bound for export to Canada as evidence of need for the pipeline.” The Circuit Court agreed and remanded to FERC, but did not vacate the Certificate.
WebFERC – Can FERC Rely on Gas Export to Authorize Eminent Domain? Last month, on behalf of the City of Oberlin, Ohio I argued a boundary-pushing case at the D.C.Circuit which asks whether the Commission can justify a finding of convenience and necessity for a pipeline under Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act when it will be used almost entirely ...
WebD.C. Cir. No. 20-1492 Order on remand, from decision in City of Oberlin v. FERC, 937 F.3d 599 (D.C. Cir. 2024), concerning need for pipeline project. NEXUS Gas Transmission, … WebMar 15, 2024 · Id. at 24 citing City of Oberlin, Ohio v. FERC, 937 F.3d 599, 611 (D.C. Cir. 2024). ... beginning in the Office of General Counsel of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and continuing ...
WebJun 21, 2024 · v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, RESPONDENT. SPIRE MISSOURI INC. AND SPIRE STL PIPELINE LLC, INTERVENORS. Consolidated …
WebParties, docket activity and news coverage of federal case City of Oberlin, Ohio v. FERC, case number 20-1492, from Appellate - DC Circuit Court. marc difazio mdWebJul 8, 2024 · See City of Oberlin v. FERC (“Oberlin I”), 937 F.3d 599, 606 (D.C. Cir. 2024). We agreed that FERC had not explained why considering these agreements was lawful and remanded without vacatur for FERC to justify its decision. See id. at 606–07, 611. On remand, FERC explained its decision. crystal picardWebIn the case of City of Oberlin, Ohio v. FERC, the DC Circuit reversed an earlier finding that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) had not explained why export volumes on a proposed interstate pipeline project can be used to help justify approval of the new pipe projects. marc difrancesco realtorWebDocket for City of Oberlin, Ohio v. FERC, 18-1248 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. marc digiacomoWebJun 22, 2024 · City of Oberlin v. FERC, 937 F.3d 599, 602 (D.C. Cir. 2024). To safeguard the public, "Section 7 of the Act requires an entity seeking to construct or extend an interstate pipeline for the transportation of natural gas to obtain [a Certificate] from the Commission." Id. (citing 15 U.S.C. § 717f(c)(1)(A)). The Commission may issue … marc digirolamoWebJun 18, 2024 · city of oberlin, ohio and coalition to reroute nexus, petitioners, v. federal energy regulatory commission, respondent. ----- nexus gas transmission, llc, intervenor for respondent. on petitions for review of orders of the federal energy regulatory commission petitioners’ response to intervenor’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject … marc difazio neurologyWebCITY OF OBERLIN, OHIO, Petitioner, v. ... ON PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION PAGE-PROOF BRIEF OF PETITIONER Carolyn Elefant LAW OFFICES OF CAROLYN ELEFANT 7315 Wisconsin Avenue Bethesda, Maryland 20814 (202) 297-6100 [email protected] marc difazio children\u0027s national