Webfor payment of the levy. 17. If the levy is still to be calculated by project value, the definition of project owner should be changed so that the levy is payable by the landowner or head lessee rather than the current definition of project owner. Disagree – The current project definition for the collection of the levy should be retained. 18. Web21. If the levy is based on project value, it should apply to a project’s value excluding GST. Response: Yes, supported. The Board agrees that the levy should apply to the project value excluding GST. Abstained: Peter Russell. 22. If the levy remains calculated based on project value and exemptions are reduced resulting
Hugh Garai - Director - Instructional Design & Content ... - LinkedIn
WebFor example, where the agreed contract price is £1,000 (plus VAT) and the CITB levy is,say £7, the sum that should be shown on the monthly return as the gross amount of the … Web15 sep. 2015 · Can stronger skills markets contribute to sustainable and decent work for all? UKFIET Conference 2015 sharyn parks brown
Property Council of Australia – submission to the review of the ...
WebCITB - Levy training course Oct 2013 - Feb 2014. Training course for CITB trainers on the operation of the Levy and Grant system it operates for the construction industry. The … WebChanges to the annual levy. The CITB has indicated that the way that the levy is calculated is going to change. It was first suggested that the changes would be in place … Web20. In the absence of an alternative method of calculation than project value, the 0.25% levy remains as an appropriate rate for the Board to fulfil its role and functions under the Act. The NFIA agrees with this proposition. 21. If the levy is based on project value, it should apply to a project’s value excluding GST. sharyn mccrumb website